PoliCheck Network
← Back to bills
H.R. 10090119th CongressReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on certain institutions of higher education that allow male participation in female intercollegiate athletic programs or events.

Introduced: Aug 13, 2026
Latest action: Aug 13, 2026

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

1
Primary Sponsors
2
Cosponsors
2
Recorded Actions
0
Linked Votes

Plain-English AI Summary

What this bill means

Generated from the official bill text to make the legislation easier to understand.

Summary Ready

What this bill does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create a tax penalty for certain private colleges and universities that allow biological males to participate in female-designated intercollegiate athletic programs or events. It also directs the Secretary of Education to create rules prohibiting institutions from passing the costs of this tax onto students.

Who it affects

* **Private higher education institutions:** Private colleges and universities that meet the tax code criteria for eligible educational institutions. * **College athletes:** Students competing in female-designated intercollegiate athletic programs. The bill strictly defines "male," "female," and "sex" based on an individual's biological reproductive system (producing sperm vs. eggs). * **College students:** Students at affected private institutions, who are protected from tax-related cost increases. * **The Department of Education:** The Secretary of Education is required to write and enforce regulations enforcing the tuition and fee protections.

What would change

* **Tax Penalty:** If an eligible private institution allows a biological male to participate in any female-designated intercollegiate sports team or event at any point during a tax year, the institution must pay an excise tax. * **Prohibition on Tuition Hikes:** Institutions that incur this tax penalty are explicitly forbidden from raising tuition or mandatory student fees to pay for it. * **Agency Enforcement:** The Secretary of Education must issue regulations to enforce the rule preventing schools from passing tax liabilities onto students. * **Implementation Timeline:** These changes would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

Money or funding

* **Excise Tax Amount:** The tax is equal to 10 percent of the institution’s total aggregate annual athletic spending across all of its intercollegiate sports programs for that taxable year. * **Tuition Restrictions:** Affected schools cannot use tuition or mandatory fee increases to cover the costs of the tax liability.

Important exceptions or limits

* **Exemption for Public Institutions:** State colleges and universities are explicitly excluded from the tax requirements. * **Biological Definitions:** Definitions of male and female account for exceptions involving developmental or genetic anomalies or historical accidents concerning reproductive systems.

Plain-English bottom line

Starting after December 31, 2025, private colleges and universities that permit biological males to compete in female intercollegiate athletic programs will be charged a 10 percent tax on their entire annual sports spending, and they will be legally barred from raising student tuition or fees to cover the penalty.

This summary was generated by AI from the official bill text. It is intended to make legislation easier to understand and does not replace the original legal language.

AI model: gemini-3.6-flashUpdated: Sep 16, 2026Review official bill text ↗

Official Summary

Official legislative summary associated with this bill.

No official summary is currently available.

Primary Sponsors

Members listed as primary sponsors of this legislation.

Cosponsors

Members who joined this legislation as cosponsors.

Recorded Actions

Official legislative actions recorded for this measure.

H11100Aug 13, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official source ↗
Intro-HAug 13, 2026

Introduced in House

Official source ↗

Linked Votes

Roll-call votes associated with this legislation.

No roll-call votes are currently linked to this bill.
Discussion notificationsSign in to subscribe
?
No comments yet. Start the conversation.